Deuteronomy 19 quiz

20 Challenging Deuteronomy 19 Quiz Questions and Answers

This Deuteronomy 19 quiz tests one of the most procedural chapters in the Mosaic law: three cities of refuge, the boundary stone, and the courtroom standard of two or three witnesses. It runs naturally with the Deuteronomy 18 quiz and the Deuteronomy 17 quiz, which set up the priestly and judicial framework this chapter assumes. For broader practice, the hardest Bible trivia questions and our entire Bible quiz push the test wider, while what Moses knew that most Christians don’t goes underneath the legal surface.

Deuteronomy 19 Quiz Questions and Answers

Question 1: Verse 21 lists five exact correspondences in its closing line. Which set names them in the order given?
  • A. life, eye, tooth, finger, foot
  • B. life, eye, ear, hand, foot
  • C. life, eye, tongue, hand, foot
  • D. life, eye, tooth, hand, foot
  • E. life, eye, tooth, hand, knee
View Answer

Answer 1: D. The five pairings are life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot. The order is fixed and the items are specific. Substitutions like finger, ear, tongue, or knee do not appear in this verse.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:21. “And thine eye shall not pity; but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.”

Question 2: What specific accident does verse 5 describe to illustrate ignorant manslaughter?
  • A. The axe head slipping from the helve while felling a tree
  • B. A wagon overturning on a man at his plough
  • C. A heavy stone falling from a wall onto a passerby
  • D. A horse kicking a man during the work of his master
  • E. A spear flying wide of its mark in the open field
View Answer

Answer 2: A. The illustration is precise. Two neighbours go into the wood to hew wood, the axe head slips from its handle, and the head strikes the neighbour fatally. No malice, no quarrel, no warning. The other options are plausible accidents but none of them is the case the verse names.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:5. “As when a man goeth into the wood with his neighbour to hew wood, and his hand fetcheth a stroke with the axe to cut down the tree, and the head slippeth from the helve, and lighteth upon his neighbour, that he die.”

Question 3: How many witnesses does this chapter require for any matter to be established?
  • A. Seven men of the gate
  • B. Three or four witnesses
  • C. Two to Four elders of the city
  • D. Five witnesses with the priest
  • E. Two or three witnesses
View Answer

Answer 3: E. The standard is two or three witnesses, and one witness is explicitly insufficient. The same numerical standard is later carried into the New Testament for both formal accusation and church discipline.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:15. “One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin… at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.”

Question 4: Concerning a neighbour’s landmark, what does this chapter forbid?
  • A. Trespassing past it after the sun is set
  • B. Carving thy name upon any face of it
  • C. Removing that which they of old time have set
  • D. Striking it down for any cause whatever
  • E. Selling the land it bounds without consent
View Answer

Answer 4: C. The verb is removing, not striking, carving, or trespassing. The concern is property boundaries that the previous generation has fixed, which a man would shift in secret to enlarge his own inheritance at his neighbour’s loss.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:14. “Thou shalt not remove thy neighbour’s landmark, which they of old time have set in thine inheritance.”

Question 5: For what stated reason did the cities of refuge need to be physically reachable?
  • A. To prevent the slayer from fleeing into a foreign land
  • B. Lest the way be long and the avenger overtake him
  • C. To allow the elders time to gather every full witness
  • D. So that the slayer might find counsel from the priest
  • E. That the city of his birth might not be defiled
View Answer

Answer 5: B. The reasoning is purely practical. Distance plus a hot-tempered avenger would equal the slayer’s death before he ever reached safety. The road system existed to make the law of refuge actually work.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:6. “Lest the avenger of the blood pursue the slayer, while his heart is hot, and overtake him, because the way is long, and slay him.”

Question 6: On what condition would three additional cities of refuge be added beyond the first three?
  • A. If Israel kept the commandments and walked in God’s ways
  • B. When all twelve tribes had fully crossed the Jordan
  • C. When the borders touched the great river Euphrates
  • D. After the priest declared the land fully cleansed
  • E. Once seven years of peace had passed in the land
View Answer

Answer 6: A. The condition is moral and covenantal, not geographic or political. Enlargement of territory was tied to obedience, and only an obedient Israel would receive a wider land that required additional cities.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:9. “If thou shalt keep all these commandments… to love the LORD thy God, and to walk ever in his ways; then shalt thou add three cities more for thee, beside these three.”

Question 7: Who was responsible for fetching a true murderer back from a city of refuge?
  • A. The avenger of blood by his own hand
  • B. The priests serving at the chosen place
  • C. The elders of the murderer’s own city
  • D. The judges who sat in those days
  • E. The captains of the host of Israel
View Answer

Answer 7: C. The elders of the murderer’s own city executed the extradition, then handed him to the avenger. The structure prevents both vigilante violence and impunity through flight.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:12. “Then the elders of his city shall send and fetch him thence, and deliver him into the hand of the avenger of blood, that he may die.”

Question 8: What was the defining condition that qualified a slayer to flee to a city of refuge?
  • A. He was a stranger sojourning in the land
  • B. He hated not his neighbour in time past
  • C. He was below the age of full accountability
  • D. He had no kinsman able to act as avenger
  • E. He was a Levite of the tribe of Aaron
View Answer

Answer 8: B. The qualifier is the absence of prior hatred. The act must be ignorant, the relationship unhostile. Status (stranger, Levite, kinless) is irrelevant. Motive is everything.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:4. “Whoso killeth his neighbour ignorantly, whom he hated not in time past.”

Question 9: What was the stated purpose of preparing the way to the cities of refuge?
  • A. That the slayer might pay full restitution
  • B. That the avenger might find his satisfaction
  • C. That the priests might examine the case
  • D. That innocent blood be not shed in the land
  • E. That the land might be cleansed by sacrifice
View Answer

Answer 9: D. The accidental death of the manslayer at the avenger’s hand would itself be the shedding of innocent blood, leaving guilt on the land. The road system was a national safeguard against bloodguilt.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:10. “That innocent blood be not shed in thy land, which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance, and so blood be upon thee.”

Question 10: Before whom must both parties to a controversy stand, according to verse 17?
  • A. Before the elders sitting in the city gate
  • B. Before the captain of the host of Israel
  • C. Before the heads of the twelve tribes of Israel
  • D. Before the king and his royal counsellors
  • E. Before the LORD, the priests, and the judges
View Answer

Answer 10: E. The forum is sacred and judicial together: the LORD, the priests, and the judges. False testimony is therefore not merely a civil wrong but a violation committed under God’s direct gaze.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:17. “Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the LORD, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days.”

Question 11: How many cities of refuge were Israel commanded to separate initially in the land?
  • A. Four cities
  • B. Three cities
  • C. Six cities
  • D. Seven cities
  • E. Twelve cities
View Answer

Answer 11: B. Three cities at first, with three more contingent on enlargement. The number six (often associated with cities of refuge in Joshua and Numbers) is the eventual total, not the initial command in this chapter.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:2. “Thou shalt separate three cities for thee in the midst of thy land, which the LORD thy God giveth thee to possess it.”

Question 12: What was to be done to a witness proven false in his testimony?
  • A. He was to be silenced from speaking publicly
  • B. He was to pay double the value to his brother
  • C. He was to be banished from the city of his birth
  • D. He was to make a sacrifice of atonement at the altar
  • E. As he had thought to do unto his brother, so unto him
View Answer

Answer 12: E. The penalty was the exact penalty he had sought against his brother. If he had pursued death, death fell on him. The principle eliminates any incentive for false witness, since the lie returns intact.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:19. “Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you.”

Question 13: Verse 20 names three responses that follow the public judgment of a false witness. Which set names them in order?
  • A. They mourn, they fast, and they pray with the priests
  • B. They flee, they hide, and they bow before the judges
  • C. They watch, they wait, and they obey the elders quickly
  • D. They hear, they fear, and they commit no more such evil
  • E. They remember, they repent, and they offer up a sacrifice
View Answer

Answer 13: D. Hear, fear, and commit no more. The same three-part deterrent formula appears in Deuteronomy 17:13 regarding presumptuous offenders. Public judgment is meant to produce public restraint.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:20. “And those which remain shall hear, and fear, and shall henceforth commit no more any such evil among you.”

Question 14: What did this chapter command Israel to do toward the murderer who fled to a city of refuge?
  • A. To show no pity and put away innocent blood
  • B. To bring him before the priests for atonement
  • C. To require of him a ransom for his life
  • D. To wait until the death of the high priest
  • E. To send him forth into the wilderness alone
View Answer

Answer 14: A. The city of refuge does not protect a true murderer. Pity in such a case becomes complicity, and the land would carry his bloodguilt. The waiting-for-the-high-priest provision belongs to Numbers 35, not this chapter.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:13. “Thine eye shall not pity him, but thou shalt put away the guilt of innocent blood from Israel, that it may go well with thee.”

Question 15: What were the judges required to do before passing sentence on a witness?
  • A. To bind him with cords until the priests inquired
  • B. To consult the elders of the man’s home city
  • C. To make diligent inquisition of the matter
  • D. To wait three full days before pronouncing
  • E. To assemble all the men of the congregation
View Answer

Answer 15: C. The duty is investigative, not procedural. Diligent inquisition meant rigorous examination of evidence and testimony, since the penalty awaiting a proven false witness was severe.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:18. “And the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother.”

Question 16: Into how many parts was Israel to divide the coasts of the land for the cities of refuge?
  • A. Into seven equal parts
  • B. Into twelve tribal parts
  • C. Into two parts east and west
  • D. Into four parts of the land
  • E. Into three parts
View Answer

Answer 16: E. Three parts, one city per part. The geographic distribution makes refuge accessible from any region of the land within a single day’s flight.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:3. “Thou shalt prepare thee a way, and divide the coasts of thy land, which the LORD thy God giveth thee to inherit, into three parts.”

Question 17: What phrase describes the state of the avenger of blood while pursuing the slayer?
  • A. While his sword was drawn
  • B. While his heart is hot
  • C. While his blood is risen
  • D. While his anger is fierce
  • E. While his face is darkened
View Answer

Answer 17: B. The KJV’s image is “while his heart is hot.” The chapter assumes that grief and rage will cloud judgment in the early hours after a death, and the road to the city of refuge must outpace that heat.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:6. “Lest the avenger of the blood pursue the slayer, while his heart is hot, and overtake him.”

Question 18: Verse 11 lists three actions that mark a true murderer rather than an ignorant slayer. Which set names them in order?
  • A. Plot, gather companions, slay him at the gate
  • B. Curse, ambush, strike a blow with the sword
  • C. Hate, lie in wait, rise up and smite mortally
  • D. Hate, follow secretly, slay him in the field
  • E. Mock, conspire, kill in the dwelling place
View Answer

Answer 18: C. Hatred, premeditation (lying in wait), and the violent act together establish murder. The verse builds the legal definition that excludes the murderer from the protection of the city of refuge.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:11. “But if any man hate his neighbour, and lie in wait for him, and rise up against him, and smite him mortally that he die, and fleeth into one of these cities.”

Question 19: What does verse 16 specifically call the testimony of a false witness rising up against a man?
  • A. That which is wrong
  • B. A grievous lie of the tongue
  • C. An evil report against the brother
  • D. A perverse word out of season
  • E. A wicked report of unrighteousness
View Answer

Answer 19: A. The KJV’s phrase is austere: “that which is wrong.” Not slander, not perjury, not a wicked report. Simply wrong. The plainness of the wording matches the simplicity of the standard the judges must apply.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:16. “If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong.”

Question 20: How does verse 8 describe the basis of God’s promise to enlarge Israel’s coast?
  • A. He swore it by the holy mountain of Horeb
  • B. He decreed it for the sake of his great name
  • C. He spoke it in the day of the assembly
  • D. As he had sworn unto their fathers
  • E. He commanded it through Moses his servant
View Answer

Answer 20: D. Enlargement of the coast rests on the patriarchal oath, not on any later instrument. The same promise to the fathers underwrites the contingency for the additional three cities of refuge in verse 9.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 19:8. “And if the LORD thy God enlarge thy coast, as he hath sworn unto thy fathers, and give thee all the land which he promised to give unto thy fathers.”

The chapter that opens roads to protect the innocent closes them on the false witness.

⬆ Back to Top

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top