Between the rebellious-son legislation of chapter 21 and the assembly-exclusion list of chapter 23 sits one of the most miscellaneous chapters in the Mosaic law. The Deuteronomy 22 quiz below covers fourteen regimes packed into a single chapter, from lost property to capital sexual offenses.
Continue with the Deuteronomy 21 quiz on the chapter immediately before, the Deuteronomy 23 quiz on the chapter immediately after, and the entire Bible quiz for full coverage.
Deuteronomy 22 Quiz Questions and Answers
View Answer
Answer 1: B. The case is opened by the husband’s hatred toward his new wife, which then escalates into a public accusation. The legal frame is the husband’s malice, not the wife’s behaviour, which is precisely why the verses that follow build a procedure for proving slander.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:13. “If any man take a wife, and go in unto her, and hate her.”
View Answer
Answer 2: D. The mother bird must be released; only the young or the eggs could be taken. The rule preserves the next generation by guarding the breeding pair, applying creation-care logic to a small daily situation a hunter might face.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:6. “thou shalt not take the dam with the young.”
View Answer
Answer 3: A. The prohibition is bilateral and absolute. The verse closes with the LORD’s verdict attached: “all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God,” placing the matter in the same theological category as idolatry rather than mere social custom.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:5. “The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment.”
View Answer
Answer 4: E. The verse names the father’s wife and adds the reason: such a man “discovereth his father’s skirt.” The prohibition assumes a polygamous household and protects the father’s marriage from being violated by a son in the same family.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:30. “A man shall not take his father’s wife, nor discover his father’s skirt.”
View Answer
Answer 5: C. Adultery in this chapter is a joint capital offence. The verse closes with the standard formula: “so shalt thou put away evil from Israel.” The penalty mirrors the seriousness of the covenant violation, treating both parties as equally guilty.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:22. “If a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman.”
View Answer
Answer 6: E. A low parapet around the flat rooftop. The reason given is bloodguilt prevention: a man falling from a roof without the safeguard would bring blood upon the house. The law makes domestic safety a covenantal duty rather than a personal preference.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:8. “thou shalt make a battlement for thy roof, that thou bring not blood upon thine house, if any man fall from thence.”
View Answer
Answer 7: A. Active return is required, not passive observation. The verse is direct: “thou shalt not hide thyself from them.” Indifference to a brother’s loss is itself a covenant violation in this chapter.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:1. “Thou shalt not see thy brother’s ox or his sheep go astray, and hide thyself from them: thou shalt in any case bring them again unto thy brother.”
View Answer
Answer 8: C. The man alone bears the death penalty. The chapter compares the field crime to murder, since the woman could not be heard if she cried out. The legal logic preserves her innocence by recognising the absence of any rescuer.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:25. “then the man only that lay with her shall die.”
View Answer
Answer 9: B. The execution location is deliberately the father’s doorway. The location publicly registers that the household failed to bring forth a chaste daughter. The verse adds the customary “put away evil from among you” formula.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:21. “Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die.”
View Answer
Answer 10: D. The ox and the ass differ in size, strength, and pace; yoking them mistreats the weaker animal. The law sits among three “do not mingle” prohibitions in verses 9-11, each one targeting an unequal or improper combination.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:10. “Thou shalt not plow with an ox and an ass together.”
View Answer
Answer 11: D. Active help, not passive observation. The verse repeats the earlier prohibition: “thou shalt not see… and hide thyself from them.” The chapter binds the Israelite to immediate practical assistance whenever a brother’s livestock falls.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:4. “Thou shalt not see thy brother’s ass or his ox fall down by the way, and hide thyself from them: thou shalt surely help him to lift them up again.”
View Answer
Answer 12: C. Fifty shekels, paid to the father, with the additional binding clause that the man must marry her and may not put her away all his days. The hundred-shekel amount belongs to the slandered-bride case in verse 19; confusing the two figures is the trap.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:29. “Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel’s father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife.”
View Answer
Answer 13: E. The same promise the Decalogue attaches to honouring father and mother (Exodus 20:12, Deuteronomy 5:16) is here attached to a small act of mercy toward a bird. The chapter elevates a minor agricultural decision to covenantal weight.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:7. “But thou shalt in any wise let the dam go, and take the young to thee; that it may be well with thee, and that thou mayest prolong thy days.”
View Answer
Answer 14: A. Wool (animal fibre) and linen (plant fibre). The same combination was reserved for priestly garments, so its prohibition for ordinary Israelites preserved a visible distinction between sacred and common clothing.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:11. “Thou shalt not wear a garment of divers sorts, as of woollen and linen together.”
View Answer
Answer 15: B. A physical cloth carrying the tokens of virginity, presented in open court. The evidence is material rather than testimonial, which is why the chapter calls it “the tokens of the damsel’s virginity” with this much specificity.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:17. “they shall spread the cloth before the elders of the city.”
View Answer
Answer 16: A. Both die together at the city gate. The reasoning is procedural: in the city she could have cried for help and been heard. Her silence is treated as consent, distinguishing the city case from the field case in verses 25-27.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:24. “then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die.”
View Answer
Answer 17: B. Mixed seed in a vineyard, and the consequence is severe: both the new fruit and the increase of the vineyard are defiled. The law belongs to the same “do not mingle” cluster as the ox-and-ass and the wool-and-linen prohibitions.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:9. “Thou shalt not sow thy vineyard with divers seeds: lest the fruit of thy seed which thou hast sown, and the fruit of thy vineyard, be defiled.”
View Answer
Answer 18: D. Four corners, not breast or sleeve or collar. The law is brief here but is amplified in Numbers 15, where the fringes carry blue thread and serve as a visible covenantal reminder. Deuteronomy preserves the placement command without the full ritual elaboration.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:12. “Thou shalt make thee fringes upon the four quarters of thy vesture, wherewith thou coverest thyself.”
View Answer
Answer 19: C. One hundred shekels, paid to the father of the wife. The penalty also includes physical chastisement and the lifelong inability to divorce her. Together the three penalties make slandering a wife economically and personally ruinous to the husband.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:19. “And they shall amerce him in an hundred shekels of silver, and give them unto the father of the damsel, because he hath brought up an evil name upon a virgin of Israel.”
View Answer
Answer 20: E. The legal reasoning is geographic, not testimonial. In the open field her cry could not be heard, so the law presumes her innocent. The chapter compares her case to murder rather than to consensual sin.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:27. “For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her.”
View Answer
Answer 21: C. The verse extends the principle from livestock to ass, raiment, and any lost thing. The phrase “thou mayest not hide thyself” reframes inaction as a positive offence. Indifference is the violation the law actually targets.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:3. “and with all lost thing of thy brother’s, which he hath lost, and thou hast found, shalt thou do likewise: thou mayest not hide thyself.”
View Answer
Answer 22: E. The penalty is execution by stoning, performed by the men of her city. The verse states the reason: “she hath wrought folly in Israel.” The location is the door of her father’s house, registering household accountability for the bride’s conduct.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:21. “and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die.”
View Answer
Answer 23: B. The conditions are precise: unbetrothed, laid hold on, and discovered. The “and they be found” clause distinguishes this from the secret crime in the field; the man’s identity is known, which is why the law can compel marriage and payment.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:28. “If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found.”
View Answer
Answer 24: D. The specific charge is the absence of an outcry within hearing range of help. Silence in the city is treated as consent because rescue would have been possible. The same standard cannot apply in the field, which is why the field case in verses 25-27 reaches an opposite verdict.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:24. “the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city.”
View Answer
Answer 25: A. The finder becomes the temporary keeper. The animal must remain in his care, fed and protected, until the owner comes searching. The law assumes restitution as the goal and prevents the finder from claiming abandonment as a path to ownership.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 22:2. “And if thy brother be not nigh unto thee, or if thou know him not, then thou shalt bring it unto thine own house, and it shall be with thee until thy brother seek after it, and thou shalt restore it to him again.”
The chapter that opens by forbidding a man to ignore his brother’s lost ox closes by forbidding him to take his father’s wife.






