Deuteronomy 23 is the chapter that draws the lines: who may enter the assembly, who is excluded, and what conduct must stay outside the camp. The Deuteronomy 23 quiz below tests the boundaries the chapter sets and the reasons the chapter gives for them.
Take it after the Deuteronomy 22 quiz on the laws that precede this section, before the Deuteronomy 24 quiz on divorce and gleaning that follows, and the entire Bible quiz for the broader sweep.
Deuteronomy 23 Quiz Questions and Answers
View Answer
Answer 1: D. The verse names two specific forbidden gifts and adds the LORD’s verdict: “for even both these are abomination unto the LORD thy God.” The prohibition prevents the sanctuary from being underwritten by funds drawn from cultic prostitution or any related defilement.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:18. “Thou shalt not bring the hire of a whore, or the price of a dog, into the house of the LORD thy God for any vow.”
View Answer
Answer 2: B. Two specific historical offences: failure of basic hospitality during the wilderness journey, and active hostility through hiring Balaam. The chapter treats both inaction (no bread, no water) and action (paid curse) as equally serious covenantal breaches.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:4. “Because they met you not with bread and with water in the way, when ye came forth out of Egypt; and because they hired against thee Balaam the son of Beor of Pethor of Mesopotamia, to curse thee.”
View Answer
Answer 3: E. A small spade or paddle, used to dig and cover human waste outside the camp. The detail is striking: every soldier carried a tool for sanitation alongside his weapon, treating the camp’s cleanliness as a military duty.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:13. “And thou shalt have a paddle upon thy weapon; and it shall be, when thou wilt ease thyself abroad, thou shalt dig therewith.”
View Answer
Answer 4: A. The verse adds the consequence directly: delay itself becomes sin in the LORD’s eyes. The chapter treats vow-fulfilment as an active obligation with a clock attached, not a future intention to be honoured at convenience.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:21. “When thou shalt vow a vow unto the LORD thy God, thou shalt not slack to pay it: for the LORD thy God will surely require it of thee; and it would be sin in thee.”
View Answer
Answer 5: C. The law makes Israel a refuge rather than an enforcer of foreign slavery. The escaped servant’s appearance among them ends the master’s claim outright. The verse is one of the most striking refugee provisions in the entire Mosaic law.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:15. “Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant which is escaped from his master unto thee.”
View Answer
Answer 6: A. The exclusion is highly specific to mutilation of the male reproductive organs. Such procedures were associated with Canaanite cult practices, and the law preserves the visible distinction between Israel’s worship and the surrounding ritual castration cults.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:1. “He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD.”
View Answer
Answer 7: E. The rule draws a precise line between immediate hunger and harvest theft. Hand-plucking for the moment is permitted; the sickle, which signals organised harvesting, is the offence. The same principle governs the parallel vineyard law in verse 24.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:25. “When thou comest into the standing corn of thy neighbour, then thou mayest pluck the ears with thine hand; but thou shalt not move a sickle unto thy neighbour’s standing corn.”
View Answer
Answer 8: C. Two-stage purification: temporary exclusion outside the camp during the day, then washing with water at evening, then return at sundown. The procedure protects the camp’s ritual cleanliness while not permanently penalising the affected man.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:10-11. “If there be among you any man, that is not clean by reason of uncleanness that chanceth him by night, then shall he go abroad out of the camp… when evening cometh on, he shall wash himself with water.”
View Answer
Answer 9: B. Two specific historical reasons. The Edomite carries kinship (descended from Esau, Jacob’s brother), and the Egyptian carries the memory of Israel’s sojourn there. Both reasons reach back into the patriarchal narrative and the Exodus history.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:7. “Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite; for he is thy brother: thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian; because thou wast a stranger in his land.”
View Answer
Answer 10: D. Ten generations, with the closing phrase “for ever” intensifying the exclusion. The number contrasts sharply with the third-generation entry permitted to Edomites and Egyptians in verse 8, marking the severity of the Ammonite-Moabite offence.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:3. “An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD for ever.”
View Answer
Answer 11: C. The verse is broad: usury of any kind on a brother is forbidden, listing money, victuals, and “any thing that is lent.” The category “brother” includes any fellow Israelite, not only kin or priest. The next verse permits usury only with strangers.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:19. “Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury.”
View Answer
Answer 12: A. The prohibition is bilateral: no female and no male cult prostitute is to come from among the covenant people. The verse targets the Canaanite religious system in which sexual rites were part of temple worship, ruling it out at the national level.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:17. “There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel.”
View Answer
Answer 13: D. Eating freely is permitted; carrying off in a vessel is theft. The same line is drawn in verse 25 between hand-plucking and sickle-using in the standing corn. The two laws together form a coherent principle: hospitality for the hungry, protection against harvest theft.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:24. “When thou comest into thy neighbour’s vineyard, then thou mayest eat grapes thy fill at thine own pleasure; but thou shalt not put any in thy vessel.”
View Answer
Answer 14: E. The reason is theological, not hygienic. The LORD’s actual presence in the camp makes uncleanness a covenantal offence rather than a public-health concern. The verse adds: “therefore shall thy camp be holy: that he see no unclean thing in thee.”
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:14. “For the LORD thy God walketh in the midst of thy camp, to deliver thee, and to give up thine enemies before thee.”
View Answer
Answer 15: B. Third generation, contrasting with the tenth-generation exclusion of Ammonites and Moabites. The differential treatment is deliberate: kinship (Edom) and shared history (Egypt) reduce the period of exclusion despite past hostilities.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:8. “The children that are begotten of them shall enter into the congregation of the LORD in their third generation.”
View Answer
Answer 16: E. The Hebrew “mamzer” denotes a child of an illicit union; the KJV translates it bluntly as “bastard.” The exclusion mirrors the ten-generation phrasing applied to the Ammonites and Moabites in the next verse, suggesting an indefinite duration in practice.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:2. “A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD.”
View Answer
Answer 17: C. Free choice of residence, with the additional command “thou shalt not oppress him.” The verse extends from the prohibition on extradition in verse 15 into a positive grant of self-determination, treating the escaped servant as a free man rather than a tolerated guest.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:16. “He shall dwell with thee, even among you, in that place which he shall choose in one of thy gates, where it liketh him best: thou shalt not oppress him.”
View Answer
Answer 18: B. The verse is unconditional. Spoken vows are binding the moment the words leave the mouth, with no procedural escape route. The verse closes by tying the obligation back to free will: “according as thou hast vowed unto the LORD thy God, which thou hast promised with thy mouth.”
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:23. “That which is gone out of thy lips thou shalt keep and perform; even a freewill offering, according as thou hast vowed unto the LORD thy God.”
View Answer
Answer 19: D. Strangers only, with the closing reason given: that the LORD may bless Israel in all they set their hand unto in the land. The contrast with the brother in verse 19 is sharp; usury is permissible economic practice across covenant lines but forbidden within them.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:20. “Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury.”
View Answer
Answer 20: A. The verse adds the underlying motive directly: “because the LORD thy God loved thee.” The episode in Numbers 22-24 is condensed into a single sentence here, with the entire reversal credited to divine love rather than Balaam’s reluctance or Israel’s righteousness.
KJV Reference: Deuteronomy 23:5. “Nevertheless the LORD thy God would not hearken unto Balaam; but the LORD thy God turned the curse into a blessing unto thee, because the LORD thy God loved thee.”
The chapter that lists who may not enter the congregation closes by binding the man inside it to the words his own lips have spoken.






